Was the boston massacre really a

I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre. I think this because there was a lot of propaganda, and the low death toll. The definition of a massacre is an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

Was the boston massacre really a

Was the Boston Massacre really a massacre? Monday, March 2, - Drawn by Henry Pelham, it was powerful colonial propaganda -- but inaccurate. On March 5,British soldiers shot into a rowdy crowd and killed five colonists, a tragedy that became known as the Boston Massacre.

The shooting has been studied and debated over and again in history books. But was it, strictly speaking, a massacre?

Boston Massacre - Wikipedia

The event, years ago this week, was the culmination of escalating violence in Boston essentially brought on by taxes levied by the British crown and enforced by its army.

Colonists objected to a series of taxes, especially the Townshend Acts ofnamed for Charles Townshend, chancellor of the exchequer treasurer of Great Britain. The acts taxed imported goods including glass, tea, lead, paint and paper, while also undercutting the authority of colonial assemblies.

The American Revolution Viking; Colonists famously fought taxes by boycotting goods.

The Boston Massacre

But not all protests were nonviolent. A group formed, calling itself the Sons of Liberty — a name inspired by a speech delivered in Parliament by an American sympathizer, Irish-born Col.

The Sons of Liberty used force and intimidation against customs officers charged with enforcing Parliament's taxes. A British fleet sailed into Boston harbor on Sept, 30, The ship's cannon was pointed at the town, Fischer writes.

Two regiments landed and marched into Boston. Ebenezer Richardson, considered a Tory informer for British customs commissioners, attempted to defend the merchant by taking a musket and firing into the crowd. His shots killed Christopher Seider, Then, on March 2, there were scuffles involving British soldiers and rope-workers, according to the Massachusetts Historical Society.

On a cold night a few days later -- March 5, -- a group of young men taunted Pvt. Hugh White, a British soldier guarding the Customs House. This drew attention and brought more bystanders, who then began tossing ice, snow and oyster shells.

Church bells rang — a signal that residents were needed to fight a fire. Meanwhile, reinforcements arrived under the command of Capt.Oct 27,  · Watch video · The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, , on King Street in Boston.

Churchill delivers Iron Curtain speech

It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly. - Was the Boston Massacre really a massacre. In history, there are many events where the exact occurrences are not clear.

The Boston Massacre, which took place on the evening of March 5, , was absolutely no exception. Watch video · Boston Massacre. Shots fired by British soldiers in the streets of Boston in would spark the American Revolution.

Jun 07,  · Did the confrontation on King Street on the night of 5 March really add up to a "massacre"? The Boston town meeting commissioned a report on the incident titled A Short Narrative of the Horrid Massacre, and that name stuck.

But many people today, learning that .

Boston Boston Massacre: really a "massacre"?

The Boston Massacre in was not really a massacre, but a mutual riot (Boston Massacre History Society). British soldiers went to America to keep the people of Boston in order.

However, the soldier's presence there was not welcomed by the Bostonians and . The Boston Massacre, also known as “The Bloody Massacre in King Street” or the “State Street Massacre”, is a huge event that has been told and retold so many times that there are a number of inconsistencies about the actual event, during and after the incident.

Was the boston massacre really a
The Boston Massacre - HISTORY