US — prisoner rights — partial reversal — Krause In a significant prisoner case, a divided Third Circuit panel today ruled in favor of a prisoner whose suit alleged that USP Lewisburg administators retaliated against him for filing inmate grievances by moving him into a cell with another prisoner known for assaulting his cellmates.
Death Penalty Worldwide aims to bridge critical gaps in research and advocacy around the death penalty. First, it provides comprehensive, transparent data regarding death penalty laws and practices in the 87 countries and territories that retain capital punishment.
Second, it publishes reports and manuals on issues of practical relevance to defense lawyers, governments, courts and organizations grappling with questions relating to the application of the death penalty, particularly in the global south.
Third, it engages in targeted advocacy focusing on the implementation of international fair trial standards and the rights of those who come into conflict with the law, including juveniles, women, and individuals with intellectual disabilities and mental illnesses.
The database is the centerpiece of the Death Penalty Worldwide project, and was designed to meet the needs of judges, policymakers, scholars, lawyers, journalists, and human rights advocates for comprehensive information regarding the application of the death penalty around the world.
We believe that access to information is vital to inform policy decisions and legal analysis relating to capital punishment. Transparency is paramount in the documentation of human rights violations and in the development of strategies to implement international norms relating to the death penalty.
Access to information is also critical to determine what the law is, particularly when it comes to customary international law. Because the emergence of universal human rights norms under customary international law is predicated on trends in state practice, understanding how the majority of states restrict capital punishment is critical to the development of new standards and the elaboration of global abolition strategies.
In the past, gathering this kind of comparative information—for instance, in how many countries the mandatory death penalty has been ruled contrary to fair trial guarantees—required extensive and painstaking research. The database provides easy access to data regarding the practices and laws of individual countries, and permits users to search across jurisdictions to compare state practice in a wide variety of areas.
Locating reliable data on many issues relating to the death penalty is notoriously difficult—particularly for qualitative questions, such as the competence of capital defense counsel. Even more prosaic questions, such as whether national courts have issued significant decisions relating to the application of the death penalty, are not easy to answer in countries that rarely publish judicial decisions.
For those countries that treat information regarding the death penalty as a state secret, it is particularly challenging to find objective and reliable sources regarding death row demographics and execution practices.
When a definitive conclusion cannot be reached, our research sets out the available information and offers a cautious, informed assessment of state practice. To ensure that database users can gauge the accuracy of our information, we provide sources for each fact cited in the database.
Death Penalty Worldwide also aims to address issues that have received scant attention from other organizations and scholars.
For example, in JuneDPW published the first international best practices manual for capital defense lawyers. Lawyers from Pakistan, China, Taiwan, Nigeria, Uganda, Cameroon, Guinea, Belgium, France, Portugal and the United States contributed to the manual, which draws from international human rights law, national jurisprudence, and the practical experience of defense attorneys around the world.
Lawyers in the global south often receive no training in the specialized field of capital defense.
Consequently, their clients are often deprived of their fair trial rights, including their right to an effective defense. The risk of wrongful conviction also rises dramatically when prisoners are represented by poorly trained and inadequately prepared lawyers.
Our manual provides practical guidance for all stages of a capital case, including pretrial detention, investigation of mitigating evidence, trial strategy, appeals, and petitions to international human rights bodies.
The manual is available on our website in English, French and Chinese here: Finally, Death Penalty Worldwide engages in advocacy in targeted countries with local partners, focusing on the implementation of international human rights norms such as the right to individualized sentencing, the need for a competent defense, and the bar on the execution of juvenile offenders and individuals with mental or intellectual disabilities.
Through sustained engagement over a period of six years, DPW was able to train lawyers, paralegals, judges, mental health workers, and prison staff about the role of mitigating evidence, the need to conduct background investigations before sentencing proceedings, and the importance of assessing the mental health of prisoners facing the death penalty.
DPW helped build a local coalition that pressed for resentencing hearings for approximately prisoners, resulting in the immediate release as of May of 15 prisoners who had formerly been sentenced to death, and the imposition of reduced sentences for an additional 9 prisoners.
More hearings are scheduled for the remainder of As a Clinical Professor and Director of the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell University Law School, she specializes in international human rights litigation, access to justice, death penalty defense, international gender rights, and the application of international law in US courts.
With her clinic students, she has spent several years working on access to justice for prisoners in Malawi, where their advocacy has led to the release of prisoners since For her work, she was awarded the Aguila Azteca, the highest honor bestowed by the government of Mexico upon citizens of foreign countries, in He is one of the foremost death penalty practitioners in the United States, with particular expertise on the application of the death penalty to individuals with intellectual disabilities and mental illnesses.
Internationally, he has been involved for the past four years in several projects related to improving the quality of capital defense in China. Each year, the Cornell Death Penalty Project hosts a Chinese visiting scholar who researches capital punishment, and Professor Blume has given a number of presentations regarding the current status and use of the death penalty in China.The Vatican announced in August that Pope Francis has changed the Catholic Church’s teaching to fully oppose the death penalty.
The announcement comes after a Pew Research Center survey showed an uptick in the share of Americans who favor capital punishment for those convicted of murder.
|News & analysis of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, by Matthew Stiegler||The following article is an instance in which such a disclaimer was requested.|
|Capital Punishment in the United States||Indeed, inmates are six times more likely to get off death row by appeals than by execution. And, in fact, many of those cases were overturned based on post conviction new laws, established by legislative or judicial decisions in other cases.|
|The Death Penalty in United States of America||Colonial period[ edit ] Abolitionists gathered support for their claims from writings by European Enlightenment philosophers such as MontesquieuVoltaire who became convinced the death penalty was cruel and unnecessary  and Bentham. In addition to various philosophers, many members of QuakersMennonites and other peace churches opposed the death penalty as well.|
|5 facts about the death penalty | Pew Research Center||Capital punishment -- the death penalty Basic reasons that people give to support or oppose the death penalty Sponsored link.|
|Number of Executions in Each State Since 1977||Inthe United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is a pledge among nations to promote fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world. The political elite in Europe often condemn the US as human rights violators since we still use the death penalty on murderers, which they insist is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.|
Over. Capital punishment debate in the United States existed as early as the colonial period. As of it remains a legal penalty in 31 states, the federal government, and military criminal justice systems.
United States of America: The Death Penalty (Amnesty Report) published in January, , 9 is a collection of the conclusions drawn from the mission supplemented by additional, more recent data. Death Penalty Worldwide (DPW) was founded in April by Professor Sandra Babcock, Clinical Professor of Law and Director of the International Human Rights Clinic at Cornell University Law School, in partnership with the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty.
Throughout the United States, police are being laid off, prisoners are being released early, the courts are clogged, and crime continues to rise. Top 10% Absolutely Positively the Best 30 Death Penalty Websites on the Internet (Top 1%) Death Penalty Information Center Probably the single most comprehensive and authoritative internet rersource on the death penalty, including hundreds of anti-death penalty articles, essays, and quotes on issues of deterrence, cost, execution of the innocent, racism, public opinion, women, juveniles.