Cheers for pointing out. Protection would be limited to semi-protect. Protection duration would be limited to between 45m-2 hours TBD.
Poor articles[ edit ] Is there a place to list and draw attraction to poor articles, particularly articles which are of high-importance?
Failing that the article's talk page, or a related project's talk page. Martin of Sheffield talk But it seems to need improvements itself.
One example tool is this: THere is also a good chance that some high importance topics have not been written about yet. Graeme Bartlett talk But it is not news to regulars that many important articles are poor. Wouldn't that motivate projects to take charge?
Could you delete those and then turn them into stubs or something? Thanks for the clarification! That's not going to promote collaboration.
That's not going to help us build the project. Deletion is not cleanup. If you see a sentence, paragraph, or section that could be improved e.
If you see a sentence that you believe is harming the article, then take it out. But don't go around saying that if the WP: That's uncollegial and destructive. If you're thinking that threats work, then you should go read some more psychology. Oh, and while you've got those books in hand, you might as well improve the related articles, okay?
What actually works is quietly helping people. If you find a new article that someone started today, or an expansion that a new editor made to an existing article, and you add a source or a fact after waiting an hour or so to make sure they're done — Wikipedia: Avoiding edit-conflicts is importantthen when they come back tomorrow, they'll feel encouraged and interested and maybe even learn how to edit better.
That's how you get good content. If the article is a poor article, how about having an tag saying "This article may need clean up" heading it? I'm new to Wikipedia. Seems like my saying "threat" was ill-considered. Perhaps I should read up on " herding cats " Wikipedia article challenges and thought having a challenge on vital articles might be helpful.
Last week I made a post about this here as well see below. GOOD quality articles on major societal issues. Like, you wouldn't believe how hard those "simple" subjects can be.🔥Citing and more!
Add citations directly into your paper, Check for unintentional plagiarism and check for writing mistakes. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else at ashio-midori.com Read honest and .
Independent Education, December, An invisible disability: Language disorders in high school students and the implications for classroom teachers. The idea lab section of the village pump is a place where new ideas or suggestions on general Wikipedia issues can be incubated, for later submission for consensus discussion at Village pump (proposals).Try to be creative and positive when commenting on ideas.
Before creating a new section, please note. Discussions of technical issues . The Phaedrus (/ ˈ f iː d r ə s /; Ancient Greek: Φαῖδρος, lit. 'Phaidros'), written by Plato, is a dialogue between Plato's protagonist, Socrates, and Phaedrus, an interlocutor in several ashio-midori.com Phaedrus was presumably composed around BC, about the same time as Plato's Republic and Symposium.
Although ostensibly about the topic of love, the discussion in the dialogue. Come to think of it, my favorite gag is actually a panty gag sealed with tape.
I think there's just something nicely degrading about tearing off a young woman's underwear and then using them to silence her.